Skip to main content

Posts

The One Time I Tried to Be a Morning Person and Accidentally Summoned a Demon — Me!

Some people are morning people, but I am not. I am the goblin that guards the realm of night owls. I gave 5 a.m. a chance, and it rejected me.  And honestly? I’m okay with that. So, p ass me the coffee -- at noon -- like nature intended. Here is a diary of my week-long experiment: Day 1: Ambition, Meet Reality I set my alarm for 5:00 a.m., laid out my workout clothes, prepped a healthy breakfast, and fell asleep dreaming of being *That* Person—you know, the one who drinks green juice and radiates peace by 6 a.m. Cut to me smacking my alarm like it insulted my entire bloodline, crawling out of bed like a resurrected Victorian child, and sitting in silence with one eye open, holding a banana like I forgot what food is. Workout: Cancelled. Mood: Combative. Did I meditate? No. I stared at my wall and thought about how dang early it was. Day 2: I Don’t Know Who I Am Anymore I tried sunrise stretching. Spoiler: I almost fell fully asleep on the floor and woke up angry.  Also, ...

Took an Online Quiz to Find My Spirit Vegetable, and Now I Question Everything!

It all started so innocently. I was procrastinating, as one does, and thought, “Hey, I’ll take an online quiz that popped up in my social media fee to figure out my spirit vegetable.” You know, for science. Twenty minutes, three personality crises, and one suspicious result later, I’m still unsure how my favorite Muppets character and choice of breakfast pastry led to me being told I’m emotionally aligned with… a celery stick. Celery.   Dry. Crunchy. Full of water and trauma.  But that was just the beginning.   Read on: The Vegetable Awakening Quiz 1: “What Spirit Vegetable Are You Based on Your Weekend Plans?” I picked “nap,” “more nap,” and “eating snacks in bed,” which felt deeply honest. Result? Celery. Apparently, I’m “chill, reliable, and often overlooked but important in soup.” So, now I’m a background character in a stew?! Wow! My self-esteem is seasoning-dependent. Quiz 2: “Design a Dream House and We’ll Reveal Your Inner Pasta Shape” Because that makes to...

Ain't Ain't a Word, Ain't It?

In the realm of language, few words stir debate as much as “ain’t.” Often dismissed by traditionalist grammarians and teachers, this contraction has sparked discussions among linguists, writers, and everyday speakers, but let's explore the origins, usage, and controversies surrounding “ain’t,” inviting you -- the readers -- to reconsider what it means for a word to be “correct.” The word “ain’t” first emerged in the early days of English. Originally used as a contraction for “am not,” it eventually evolved to represent other negations, such as “is not,” “are not,” “has not,” and even “have not.” Over time, “ain’t” became a flexible, all-purpose negator in everyday speech. Its ability to condense multiple forms of negation into one simple word contributed to its widespread use, despite the criticisms of some purists. Traditional grammar rules label “ain’t” as -- gasp! -- a non-standard contraction. Critics argue that its use in formal writing or academic contexts undermines the clar...

An Amusing Argument: Why Is Cereal Not Soup?

Cereal is one of the most beloved and convenient meals in modern processes food culture. It’s quick, easy, and customizable—qualities that have earned it a special place in breakfast — or anytime — routines worldwide. A divisive question has emerged in recent years: Is cereal a soup? While some insist that the two share undeniable similarities, cereal should not—and must not—be considered soup. To determine whether cereal is soup, we must first define what soup is. According to the culinary definition, soup is: “A liquid dish, typically savory, made by boiling meat, fish, or vegetables in stock or water.” Key components of this definition immediately disqualify cereal: • Savory Nature: Soup is almost universally savory. Cereal, on the other hand, is a sweet dish with a few exceptions, such as the bold but misguided choice of eating Chex with chicken broth. • Cooking Process: Soup requires a process of heating or boiling to blend flavors. Cereal involves no such preparation; it is a col...

Beetlejuice 2.0 sucks worse than the original

The announcement of a sequel to Beetlejuice sparked a mix of excitement and apprehension among fans of the original. While Tim Burton’s 1988 dark comedy remains a cult classic, and ai’m being very gracious here, the decision to revisit it decades later has left many wondering: why tamper with a film that was already a perfect balance of weird, wonderful, and self-contained? Or, perhaps more succinctly, how in world do expect to polish this turd? So, maybe in hindsight, it’s clear the sequel was not only unnecessary but also a misstep. Here’s why the creators should have left Beetlejuice alone and why the follow-up fails to capture the original’s magic, if it ever had any: The charm of Beetlejuice lies in its sheer absurdity, anchored by Michael Keaton’s manic and mostly unforgettable performance as the titular ghost with the most. It was a unique product of its time, combining Burton’s quirky aesthetic with an offbeat script and an equally untalented Danny Elfman score. The movie didn’...

Just say no to moo-moos

Did you ever expect to be bombarded with advertisements for shapeless moo-moos and orthopedic sandals? Yet here I am, staring at advertisement suggestions that scream, “Hey, southern Indiana!  It’s all elastic waistbands and floral polyester from here on out.” Excuse me, publications of the world, but have you even met the women here?  Do you think they just woke up this morning with a desperate desire to give up on fashion, taste, and life itself just because of a certain “milestone” birthday, so many kids, a certain year of marriage? Do you think the second a woman turns 29+, her wardrobe automatically requires enough fabric to double as a tent? The messaging is insulting, outdated, and reeks of a world that can’t fathom women embracing this phase of their lives with style and vitality. If I see one more ad for a pastel house dress or ankle-high compression socks disguised as “athleisure,” I might scream. Here’s a newsflash for marketers and fashion “gurus” stuck in their ow...

A superb question on your first date

Which Loop Do YOU Make First?  You heard me right. Which loop do you make first when tying your shoes? Tying your shoes. It’s something most of us learned in kindergarten, perfected no later than elementary school, and now do without a second thought. It’s one of those automatic, muscle-memory tasks—like brushing your teeth or checking your phone first thing in the morning.  But — again — here’s the real question: When you tie your shoes, which loop do you make first? This is also an awesome first date question, as well, if you’re currently on the dating scene. If you’re scratching your head, don’t worry—you’re not alone. Most of us don’t consciously think about it. But the answer says more about you than you might realize — or so we’re about to pretend for the sake of this very “important” discussion. If you’re someone who ties their right loop first, congratulations—you’re probably part of the majority. Right-firsters argue it just feels natural, like writing with your domin...